HPM to Blog at #responseexpo 2010
HPM’s Feinstein to Blog #Response Expo 2010
HPM’s Feinstein to Blog #Response Expo 2010
This article is by noted author and historian Pam Geller; it is EXACTLY what I was referring to in one of my earlier posts about change and human history. Now, admitedly, Ms. Geller may have an agenda or axe to grind, I do not know, but suffice it to say that she touches on very key points about what is happening, and what one possible path might look like, should we continue walking it. This is too important to me to just sit idly by, letting the absurdity of Barack Obama's clarion-call...
The thing that seems newest to me in business is more an attitude than anything else. I don't know if it's the beginning of the dissention many are feeling with what has been communicated to me as a president unwilling to take responsibility for his own actions, "...he wants to reach back into 8 years of Bush and not accept responsibility for what he's doing now and the effects it's having. It's as if Obama is afraid to cross his own party's line in the Senate, afraid the old...
I was having lunch with a buddy of mine last week; he's a pretty high powerd VP of Sales for a good sized radio broadcasting company. As it usually does, conversation turned to business that we're doing together. I'd made a proposal to spend a certain amount of money and he needed to make sure that it didn't foul up their rate structure relative to the political windows before primaries and elections. That was all the opening I needed to state my case to a money-man at a broadcast chain.
Here's what I told him: I think that this country's political process has devolved from attracting people who are interested in serving the public interest, to becoming available only to those who have a lot of money. Money and fundraising have become the twin-engines that drives our political process. Money. Why do candidates need money? To run radio and TV commercials. It costs a pile-load of cash to pay for media... even at what the FCC calls the Lowest Earned Rate... otherwise known as the lowest rate on the outlet for the time period the candidate is requesting. Anyone care to guess how much polticians spent on media across the country in the past general election? Best estimate I've seen is somewhere over $3.2 BILLION.
So, money, not the desire to serve, has become the primary qualification for running for elective office. I'd lke to change that... at least as far as radio and TV go, because they are regulated, albeit lightly, by the government... it's also where the vast majority of the money is being spent.
Here's the plan I gave my friend over lunch. For primaries, every registered candidate automatically qualifies for twenty-one (21) FREE commercials per week for the 4 weeks leading up to the primary election on any and every radio or TV media outlet they desire. Cable systems would give candidates the same 21 FREE commercials on each insertable channel desired by the candidate. The candidates would receive 60-seconds commercials on radio, 30-seconds on TV. The candidates would receive 60-seconds spots on radio, 30-seconds on TV. All commercials would air Monday-Sunday 5am-1am, otherwise known as a "broad rotator"; their commercials would air in all days and "dayparts" i.e, 5am-10am, 10am-3pm, 3pm-8pm and 8pm-1am.
And for general elections, each candidate that qualfied through the primary would receive twenty-one (21) FREE commercials per week for the 4 weeks leading up to the general election on any and every radio or TV media outlet they desire. Cable systems would give candidates the same 21 FREE commercials on each insertable channel desired by the candidate. The candidates would receive 60-seconds spots on radio, 30-seconds on TV. All commercials would air Monday-Sunday 5am-1am, otherwise known as a "broad rotator"; their commercials would air in all days and "dayparts" i.e, 5am-10am, 10am-3pm, 3pm-8pm and 8pm-1am.
That's it. No more, no less. No opportunity for candidtates to buy more commercials. Twenty one (21) commericals per week on radio will, in less than 2 weeks, establish enough frequency for over 60% of that outlet's listeners to have heard their message 3+ times. The same for TV
If PAC's want to buy commercials on behalf of a client, they may do so, but not at political rates, but at whatever rates the outlets care to sell them at. But the root need for BIG money in our election process will be removed, while simultaneously leveling the playing field so that everyone who wishes to run for public service will have equal access to the media to state their piece.
Maybe we'd start attracting the best and the brightest instead of the rich and power hungry. A return to a government of the people, by the people, for the people is long overdue; this would be one small step in the right direction that will hopefully spawn inspired thinking and action, leading us to other great accomplishments!
What do you think?
If you like it, copy and paste it into an email and send it to everyone you know. Retweet it to everyone who's following you. Post it on your FaceBook...give this idea an opportunity to live and breathe. Let's see what we can make happen.
I'm heartsick over what's happened to our political process and the greed that drives our political engine. It's time for a shift; this proposal is the start.
-Peter