Per Inquiry Advertising - Per Inquiry Radio and Television Advertising
 

Tuesday, May 04, 2010

HPM to Blog at #responseexpo 2010

 HPM’s Feinstein to Blog #Response Expo 2010

Expanded Coverage of May 11-13 Trade Show includes MediaPoint’s Levin
 PHOENIX (April 30, 2010) — Veteran DR advertising executive Peter Feinstein, president and chief executive officer of Higher Power Marketing (HPM), will reprise his role as official blogger at Response Expo, the key annual conference for people in the direct-response marketing industry.
 Response Expo 2010 will be May 11-13 at the Hilton Bayfront in San Diego.
After offering his take last year on the speakers, seminars and exhibitors – as well as the buzz on parties and networking events – Feinstein plans several upgrades to his Response Expo coverage.
 “There is great potential to really dig into the meat of the conference and help more attendees get an enhanced sense of purpose for being there,” Feinstein says. “I want people to feel more connected to the expo rather than just attending to network.”
Among the improvements for 2010:
 • A dedicated Twitter feed will complement his long-form blog available via RSS or the Internet. “Blogging last year’s conference was a tremendous experience,” Feinstein says. “Attendees were only too happy to be interviewed, giving me their opinion on the state of the industry, their take on their business and their feelings about Response Expo. With the variety of information I was getting, I realized the benefits of employing multiple distribution formats.”
 • News and commentary will be augmented by interviews with featured speakers from the conference. “This year’s program features some of the best from inside and outside our industry,” he says. “I want to use that depth to promote increased attendance at individual seminars being held throughout the expo.”
 • To help cover all the bases, Jay Levin, president and chief operating officer of Los Angeles-based MediaPoint Network, will join Feinstein as co-blogger. “Over the past three years, Jay and I have developed a great working relationship,” Feinstein says. “I’ve been impressed with the vigor Jay brings to the creative process. Our brainstorming has brought to light some potentially powerful opportunities to really stimulate attendance, participation and overall buzz at the conference.”
 Complementary Perspective.
Levin brings more than 20 years of local, regional, national and international advertising, marketing and management experience to Response Expo. He cites four goals for himself and Feinstein:
 • Provide coverage for folks who cannot attend all the major sessions or make the show itself;
 • Supply a creative perspective that stimulates critical thinking;
 • Enhance a sense of community by prompting discussion and dialogue; and
 • Capture the attention of people in the industry unfamiliar with the event and its value.
 “I see Peter and I operating like a John Madden/Al Michaels team bringing live play and color commentary,” Levin says. “Peter and I are industry veterans who operate with the same degree of professionalism and down-to-earth realism. I’m happy to contribute my creative take on concepts, content and live play direction.”
Response Expo is presented annually by Response Magazine, the trade “bible” of the direct-response marketing industry, and the Direct Response Marketing Alliance (DRMA), a federation of industry-leading DR marketers. During the three-day event, Feinstein and Levin will post several times a day. Folks attending the expo or keeping tabs from afar can follow their coverage at twitter.com/hpowermarketing.
 “There is so much information to absorb that it can be downright exhausting,” Feinstein says. “Jay and I will try to cut through the chatter and reinforce the key points from the conference.”
 A special contributor of op-ed columns to Response, Feinstein maintains a blog on his agency’s Web site, www.hpowermarketing.com/blog. He often voices the need to keep one’s perspective in the fast-moving, high-pressure world of direct marketing to best serve the interests of all parties – clients, marketers and media partners.
 He is a passionate advocate for per-inquiry (PI) advertising, also known as direct-response or pay-per-lead (PPL) advertising. HPM has relationships with media outlets across the country – radio, television, print and mobile media – and access to their unsold inventories of ad space or time. A PI campaign puts ads in those spots at no charge to the client; instead, he or she pays for responses to the advertising. The client’s ad runs until the agreed upon number of responses is reached, allowing that client to establish a stable, predictable cost per lead (CPL) – without the heavy and unpredictable expense usually associated with buying advertising – a crucial benefit when money is tight.
 

Monday, August 17, 2009

So We Don't Repeat The Past

This article is by noted author and historian Pam Geller; it is EXACTLY what I was referring to in one of my earlier posts about change and human history.  Now, admitedly, Ms. Geller may have an agenda or axe to grind, I do not know, but suffice it to say that she touches on very key points about what is happening, and what one possible path might look like, should we continue walking it. This is too important to me to just sit idly by, letting the absurdity of Barack Obama's clarion-call...

Read More "So We Don't Repeat The Past"

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

What's New in Business?

The thing that seems newest to me in business is more an attitude than anything else.  I don't know if it's the beginning of the dissention many are feeling with what has been communicated to me as a president unwilling to take responsibility for his own actions, "...he wants to reach back into 8 years of Bush and not accept responsibility for what he's doing now and the effects it's having.  It's as if Obama is afraid to cross his own party's line in the Senate, afraid the old...

Read More "What's New in Business?"

Friday, May 15, 2009

The Political Window and Media - A Radical Departure

I was having lunch with a buddy of mine last week; he's a pretty high powerd VP of Sales for a good sized radio broadcasting company.  As it usually does, conversation turned to business that we're doing together.  I'd made a proposal to spend a certain amount of money and he needed to make sure that it didn't foul up their rate structure relative to the political windows before primaries and elections.   That was all the opening I needed to state my case to a money-man at a broadcast chain.

Here's what I told him:  I think that this country's political process has devolved from attracting people who are interested in serving the public interest, to becoming available only to those who have a lot of money.  Money and fundraising have become the twin-engines that drives our political process.  Money.  Why do candidates need money?  To run radio and TV commercials.  It costs a pile-load of cash to pay for media... even at what the FCC calls the Lowest Earned Rate... otherwise known as the lowest rate on the outlet for the time period the candidate is requesting.  Anyone care to guess how much polticians spent on media across the country in the past general election?  Best estimate I've seen is somewhere over $3.2 BILLION. 

So, money, not the desire to serve, has become the primary qualification for running for elective office.  I'd lke to change that... at least as far as radio and TV go, because they are regulated, albeit lightly, by the government... it's also where the vast majority of the money is being spent.

Here's the plan I gave my friend over lunch.  For primaries, every registered candidate automatically qualifies for twenty-one (21) FREE commercials per week for the 4 weeks leading up to the primary election on any and every radio or TV media outlet they desire.  Cable systems would give candidates the same 21 FREE commercials on each insertable channel desired by the candidate.  The candidates would receive 60-seconds commercials on radio, 30-seconds on TV.  The candidates would receive 60-seconds spots on radio, 30-seconds on TV.  All commercials would air Monday-Sunday 5am-1am, otherwise known as a "broad rotator"; their commercials would air in all days and "dayparts" i.e, 5am-10am, 10am-3pm, 3pm-8pm and 8pm-1am.

And for general elections, each candidate that qualfied through the primary would receive twenty-one (21) FREE commercials per week for the 4 weeks leading up to the general election on any and every radio or TV media outlet they desire.  Cable systems would give candidates the same 21 FREE commercials on each insertable channel desired by the candidate.  The candidates would receive 60-seconds spots on radio, 30-seconds on TV.  All commercials would air Monday-Sunday 5am-1am, otherwise known as a "broad rotator"; their commercials would air in all days and "dayparts" i.e, 5am-10am, 10am-3pm, 3pm-8pm and 8pm-1am.

That's it.  No more, no less.  No opportunity for candidtates to buy more commercials.  Twenty one (21) commericals per week on radio will, in less than 2 weeks, establish enough frequency for over 60% of that outlet's listeners to have heard their message 3+ times.  The same for TV

If PAC's want to buy commercials on behalf of a client, they may do so, but not at political rates, but at whatever rates the outlets care to sell them at.  But the root need for BIG money in our election process will be removed, while simultaneously leveling the playing field so that everyone who wishes to run for public service will have equal access to the media to state their piece.

Maybe we'd start attracting the best and the brightest instead of the rich and power hungry.  A return to a government of the people, by the people, for the people is long overdue; this would be one small step in the right direction that will hopefully spawn inspired thinking and action, leading us to other great accomplishments!

What do you think? 

If you like it, copy and paste it into an email and send it to everyone you know.  Retweet it to everyone who's following you.  Post it on your FaceBook...give this idea an opportunity to live and breathe.  Let's see what we can make happen. 

I'm heartsick over what's happened to our political process and the greed that drives our political engine.  It's time for a shift; this proposal is the start.

-Peter